annissamazing: Ten's red Chucks (Books)
[personal profile] annissamazing
I just wanted to post my College Writing assignment from last night. We wrote 300 word stories, then we were asked to edit them down to 200 words. We were asked to write about kites.

Original story:
The little girl excitedly walked home from school with a kite. It had been that week’s art project and she was excited to try it out on the first windy day. It was cut from fuchsia tissue paper into the shape of a fish, details outlined with magic marker and colored in with pastels. A cardboard collar held the mouth open to allow air to flow through the center. Long streamers off the back resembling fins were supposed to lend stability to it as it flew. As she walked, she held the kite away from her, allowing the wind to catch the kite and pull it as far as the very short string would allow.

The windy day arrived that weekend. She carefully tied the strings to the paper kite and took it outside to try it out. She held the kite away from her and gave it some slack. The wind picked it up for a couple of seconds then promptly let it fall to the earth. She picked it up and tried again and yet the kite refused to stay in the air. She held it close and took off at a run. As long as the kite was close to her, it stayed in the air. The more freedom she gave it, the lower it flew until it dragged behind her.

She picked the kite up from the road and inspected the damage. Creases where there had been no creases before and a tear in the tailfin were easily repaired, but it was evident this kite wasn’t meant to fly. She swallowed her disappointment, removed the strings and took the kite back inside.

Maybe fish weren’t meant to fly. Perhaps she would recommend to her art teacher to make birds next time. That would make more sense.


Edited down to 200 words:
The girl walked home from school with a kite that had been that week’s art project. It was cut from fuchsia tissue paper into the shape of a fish and colored with pastels. A cardboard collar held the mouth open to allow air to flow through the center. Long streamers off the back resembling fins were supposed to lend stability to it as it flew. When the first windy arrived, she took it outside to try it out. She held the kite away from her and let the wind pick it up. It fell to the earth almost immediately. She picked it up and tried again and yet the kite refused to stay in the air. She tried running with it, but the kite still dragged on the ground.

She picked up the kite and inspected the damage. Creases where there had been no creases before and a tear in the tailfin were easily repaired, but it was evident this kite wasn’t meant to fly. She sadly removed the strings and took the kite back inside.

Maybe fish weren’t meant to fly. Perhaps she would recommend to her art teacher to make birds next time. That would make more sense.


I just thought it was an interesting exercise. I think I prefer the original, though.

Date: 2011-02-10 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] garillama.livejournal.com
I prefer the first one, too. I was especially sad that you cut out the last sentences of the first and second paragraph :-(

I saw a great plaque once, that was something like this (stolen from here (http://www.aswedeingermany.de/50LanguageAndWriting/50OnLackOfBrevity.html):
Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell.

Edited down with red pen to this:
Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unneeded words, a paragraph no unneeded sentences, like a drawing should lack unneeded lines and a machine unneeded parts. Not all sentences need be short, nor all detail avoided and subjects only outlined, but every word must tell.

I thought it was really evocative. On the other hand, as the website shows, there's such a thing as editing to much. They end up editing the above paragraph all the way down to "Omit needless words." I think it loses quite a bit in the process.

Date: 2011-02-11 03:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redknightalex.livejournal.com
Just jumping in here to say that I really enjoyed those two examples, and the website, that you referenced. Definitely a thinker. Thanks.

(I'm practicing brevity here. It's hard.)

Date: 2011-02-11 03:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redknightalex.livejournal.com
I prefer the original one as well. The first was emotional and well done whereas the second one seemed to lack the emotional punch you felt when the little girl realized that flying was not for fish. (Ok, that still is really sad.)

Was the exercise to, literally, cut out words or to rearrange/use different ones instead? I can see where the emotional impact of the story could stay the same, using different words/phrases but if you could only cut out words, then the whole story because a bit of a mess.

Personally, I'm a rather verbose person and I'm pretty sure that it comes out in my writing more often than not. I'm also positive that it comes out in my posts and comments as well (this is a fine example, I must say). I don't necessarily believe that it's a bad thing, iteration of an idea, feeling, or thought can be just as powerful as using one word. Then again, one word, thought, or expression can mean the difference between a fantastic piece of writing and a sinker. Like all things in life, take everything in moderation.

This actually reminds me of a piece of fanfiction I did a year or so ago that had me writing something and, once it was finished, go back over each word to see what essential ones I could reverse to clearly change the meaning of the piece. ie changing words from "gently" to "roughly" and so forth. I'd give a better example but, well, it was a smut piece. Anyway, the exercise was interesting and really got me to thinking about the power of words and how they make the reader react.

Words do start revolutions, after all.

Too little of a good thing?

Date: 2011-02-11 03:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elgordo42.livejournal.com
"She sadly removed the strings" just does not convey the vivid emotional impact of "she swallowed her disappointment."

"Vigorous writing is concise" is a thrilling challenge to action, where "omit needless words" is just a dull rule.

Thanks -- that was fun!

Profile

annissamazing: Ten's red Chucks (Default)
Annissa

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324 2526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 03:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios